Manitoba Security Guard License Practice Test

According to the Use of Force Framework, communication is considered a

1. Use of Force option

2. Intimidate option

3. Psychological option

4. Officer presence option

The correct answer is: Use of Force option

The Use of Force Framework is a strategic model that outlines a set of rational and progressive measures that law enforcement or security personnel could adopt to address a threatening or risky situation. This framework – by design – prioritizes the least aggressive means to achieve a safe and productive resolution, starting with officer presence and followed by communication, physical control, intermediate weapons, and finally lethal force. Communication in this context is considered a 'Use of Force option.', and the reasoning behind that classification is as follows: When law enforcement or security personnel engage in verbal or nonverbal communication, it can be seen as an act of authority or a demonstration of potential force. The personnel is attempting to establish control over a situation, and this could be achieved by issuing clear instructions, asserting control, or de-escalating the tension. This engagement might prompt compliance from the individuals involved without resorting to physical interventions, thus it falls under the umbrella of 'Use of Force options'. The concept of use of force here doesn't necessarily imply physical violence or aggression, but any action taken by the officer to maintain or regain control of a situation, and communication is one vital tool in such instances. So, it's classified as a 'Use of Force option.'